United Nations
The United Nations has established several key frameworks to combat hate speech at an international level, emphasizing the importance of balancing freedom of expression with the protection of individuals from hate and discrimination:
- International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (ICCPR): Article 20 of the ICCPR obligates states to prohibit any advocacy of national, racial, or religious hatred that constitutes incitement to discrimination, hostility, or violence. This framework provides a basis for countries to enact laws that address hate speech while considering freedom of expression.
Source: United Nations. (1966). International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights. https://treaties.un.org/Pages/ViewDetails.aspx?src=IND&mtdsg_no=IV-4&chapter=4&clang=_en
- Rabat Plan of Action: Developed by the Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights (OHCHR), this plan provides practical guidelines for implementing restrictions on hate speech, focusing on the context of the speech, the intent of the speaker, and the potential impact on society.
Source: United Nations Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights. (2012). Report of the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights on the expert workshops on the prohibition of incitement to national, racial or religious hatred. https://www.ohchr.org/sites/default/files/Documents/Issues/Opinion/SeminarRabat/Rabat_draft_outcome.pdf
African Union
The African Commission on Human and Peoples’ Rights addresses hate speech within the context of African states:
- African Charter on Human and Peoples’ Rights: This charter emphasizes the protection of human rights and the prevention of discrimination. It encourages member states to enact laws that combat hate speech and promote social harmony, while also respecting freedom of expression.
Source: African Commission on Human and Peoples’ Rights. (n.d.). African Charter on Human and Peoples’ Rights. https://au.int/sites/default/files/treaties/36390-treaty-0011_-_african_charter_on_human_and_peoples_rights_e.pdf
National Legislation
Germany
Germany is known for its stringent laws on hate speech, which reflect its historical experiences and commitment to preventing hate-based violence:
- Netzwerkdurchsetzungsgesetz (NetzDG): This law requires social media platforms to remove hate speech and other illegal content within 24 hours of notification. Failure to comply can result in significant fines, emphasizing the country’s strict approach to regulating online speech.
Source: German Federal Ministry of Justice. (2017). Act to Improve Enforcement of the Law in Social Networks. https://www.article19.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/09/170901-Legal-Analysis-German-NetzDG-Act.pdf
France
France enforces strict laws against hate speech, including criminalizing Holocaust denial and outlawing hate speech based on race, religion, sex, or sexual orientation. The Loi Avia is one such law aimed at combating online hate speech, although it faced constitutional challenges over free expression concerns.
Source: Freedom house. (2020). France: Freedom on the Net 2020 Country Report. https://freedomhouse.org/country/france/freedom-net/2020
United Kingdom
The UK has robust laws against hate speech, including the Public Order Act 1986, which criminalizes speech that incites racial hatred. The UK also prosecutes online hate speech under the Malicious Communications Act 1988 and the Communications Act 2003, reflecting a commitment to addressing hate in both physical and digital spaces.
Source: UK Government. (n.d.). Hate crime laws. https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/61ba053ed3bf7f055eb9b8cf/Hate-crime-report-accessible.pdf
United States
The United States takes a different approach to hate speech, balancing First Amendment rights with protections against hate crimes:
- First Amendment of the U.S. Constitution: Protects freedom of speech, including controversial or offensive speech, unless it directly incites violence or poses a true threat. This strong emphasis on free expression results in fewer legal restrictions on hate speech compared to other countries.
Source: Cornell Law School. (n.d.). First Amendment. Legal Information Institute. https://www.law.cornell.edu/constitution/first_amendment
- Hate Crime Prevention Act: While the U.S. does not have specific hate speech laws, it addresses hate through laws like the Matthew Shepard and James Byrd Jr. Hate Crimes Prevention Act, which enhances penalties for crimes motivated by bias against race, religion, gender, sexual orientation, and other categories.
Source: U.S. Department of Justice. (2009). Matthew Shepard and James Byrd, Jr. Hate Crimes Prevention Act. https://www.justice.gov/crt/matthew-shepard-and-james-byrd-jr-hate-crimes-prevention-act-2009-0
Challenges in Legal Frameworks
Balancing free speech with protections against hate speech remains a challenge across jurisdictions:
- Varying Definitions: Different countries have different legal definitions of hate speech, making international harmonization challenging.
- Digital Platforms: The global nature of the internet complicates the regulation and enforcement of hate speech laws across borders. Social media platforms often have their own policies to address hate speech, which may or may not align with national laws.
- Enforcement: Even with laws in place, enforcement can be difficult, particularly when dealing with speech that falls within grey areas or when platforms and states disagree on what constitutes hate speech.
Funded by the European Union. Views and opinions expressed are however those of the author(s) only and do not necessarily reflect those of the European Union or the European Education and Culture Executive Agency (EACEA). Neither the European Union nor EACEA can be held responsible for them.